<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 371 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the 32 items of &quot;bolts, nuts, and screws,&quot; specifically &quot;connecting rod bolts,&quot; should be classified under Central Excise Tariff Item (T.I.) 52, not T.I. 68. Emphasizing the primary function of fastening, the Tribunal overturned the Appellate Collector&#039;s decision and reinstated the Assistant Collector&#039;s classification. It considered the specific functions and features of the bolts, relying on principles of classification and relevant judicial precedents to support its conclusion. The decision highlighted that specific entries should prevail over residuary entries, leading to the classification under T.I. 52.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 18:36:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 371 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the 32 items of &quot;bolts, nuts, and screws,&quot; specifically &quot;connecting rod bolts,&quot; should be classified under Central Excise Tariff Item (T.I.) 52, not T.I. 68. Emphasizing the primary function of fastening, the Tribunal overturned the Appellate Collector&#039;s decision and reinstated the Assistant Collector&#039;s classification. It considered the specific functions and features of the bolts, relying on principles of classification and relevant judicial precedents to support its conclusion. The decision highlighted that specific entries should prevail over residuary entries, leading to the classification under T.I. 52.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>