https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167560 Bird scaring cartridges and a pistol adaptor were examined for tariff classification under competing Customs Tariff headings. The text explains that goods used to scare birds from airport runways do not answer a heading for electric traffic control equipment, because that heading fits electrical machinery and equipment and not non-electrical bird-scaring devices. It further states that the adaptor was treated as a pistol part under the arms heading, while the cartridges were treated as pyrotechnic articles because they produced light and sound effects similar to flares rather than ordinary ammunition. The classification claim under the airport equipment heading was rejected. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Dec 2014 16:30:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167560 Bird scaring cartridges and a pistol adaptor were examined for tariff classification under competing Customs Tariff headings. The text explains that goods used to scare birds from airport runways do not answer a heading for electric traffic control equipment, because that heading fits electrical machinery and equipment and not non-electrical bird-scaring devices. It further states that the adaptor was treated as a pistol part under the arms heading, while the cartridges were treated as pyrotechnic articles because they produced light and sound effects similar to flares rather than ordinary ammunition. The classification claim under the airport equipment heading was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167560