<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 900 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s request for implementation of the order, clarified the jurisdiction of authorities in implementing laws, and directed rectification of typographical errors in the Final Order. The Tribunal emphasized that each authority must use its judgment and discretion to implement the law, stating that decisions of High Courts and Tribunal orders do not give the Tribunal the authority to direct an authority not party to the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 900 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s request for implementation of the order, clarified the jurisdiction of authorities in implementing laws, and directed rectification of typographical errors in the Final Order. The Tribunal emphasized that each authority must use its judgment and discretion to implement the law, stating that decisions of High Courts and Tribunal orders do not give the Tribunal the authority to direct an authority not party to the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>