https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254557 A tribunal cannot compel implementation of its final order against a non-party authority acting under a different statutory regime after it has become functus officio; where an order is not being implemented, the proper remedy lies before the jurisdictional High Court by writ petition. The Tribunal also declined to direct a food-adulteration authority to permit import of the consignment because that authority said the goods could not be allowed under the applicable law and it was not a party to the appeal. At the same time, it granted the appellant further time to examine the order and file one consolidated rectification application for typographical errors. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254557 A tribunal cannot compel implementation of its final order against a non-party authority acting under a different statutory regime after it has become functus officio; where an order is not being implemented, the proper remedy lies before the jurisdictional High Court by writ petition. The Tribunal also declined to direct a food-adulteration authority to permit import of the consignment because that authority said the goods could not be allowed under the applicable law and it was not a party to the appeal. At the same time, it granted the appellant further time to examine the order and file one consolidated rectification application for typographical errors. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254557