<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 897 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating goods, confirming duty demand, imposing interest, and penalty. The decision favored the appellants, rejecting the IIT examination report as unreliable due to conflicting reports and supplier statements. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of comprehensive examination procedures and addressing discrepancies in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 897 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating goods, confirming duty demand, imposing interest, and penalty. The decision favored the appellants, rejecting the IIT examination report as unreliable due to conflicting reports and supplier statements. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of comprehensive examination procedures and addressing discrepancies in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>