https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254540 The Tribunal found additions for cash in hand as opening balance, unexplained loans, and construction expenses unsustainable due to lack of incriminating material in cases of Anurag Pandey, Smt. Asha Pandey, and Sunil Kumar Pandey for various assessment years. However, unexplained cash deposits in a bank account were upheld for Sandeep Pandey. Appeals for Sunil Kumar Pandey for 2007-08 and Sandeep Pandey for 2005-06 were dismissed due to insufficient explanations and supporting evidence. The Tribunal's decisions were based on the absence of incriminating material and failure to provide adequate explanations in the respective cases. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254540 The Tribunal found additions for cash in hand as opening balance, unexplained loans, and construction expenses unsustainable due to lack of incriminating material in cases of Anurag Pandey, Smt. Asha Pandey, and Sunil Kumar Pandey for various assessment years. However, unexplained cash deposits in a bank account were upheld for Sandeep Pandey. Appeals for Sunil Kumar Pandey for 2007-08 and Sandeep Pandey for 2005-06 were dismissed due to insufficient explanations and supporting evidence. The Tribunal's decisions were based on the absence of incriminating material and failure to provide adequate explanations in the respective cases. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254540