https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5967 High courts under Article 226/227 cannot act as appellate bodies in disciplinary proceedings by re appreciating evidence or substituting conclusions on findings and punishment; their supervisory review is limited to competency and procedural regularity of the inquiry, breaches of natural justice, consideration of extraneous factors, erroneous admission or rejection of material evidence that disables a fair conclusion, conclusions that are arbitrary or unsupported by any evidence, and only in instances where punishment so shocks conscience as to be wholly disproportionate. en-us Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:37:23 +0530 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:37:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5967 High courts under Article 226/227 cannot act as appellate bodies in disciplinary proceedings by re appreciating evidence or substituting conclusions on findings and punishment; their supervisory review is limited to competency and procedural regularity of the inquiry, breaches of natural justice, consideration of extraneous factors, erroneous admission or rejection of material evidence that disables a fair conclusion, conclusions that are arbitrary or unsupported by any evidence, and only in instances where punishment so shocks conscience as to be wholly disproportionate. Articles Other Topics Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:37:23 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5967