<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 870 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254527</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Section 34 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, and the notification dated 7 October 2013. It dismissed the petitions challenging the alleged violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, concluding that the statutory provision and notification were within the legislative and executive discretion to target specific transactions for tax deduction at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 870 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254527</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Section 34 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, and the notification dated 7 October 2013. It dismissed the petitions challenging the alleged violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, concluding that the statutory provision and notification were within the legislative and executive discretion to target specific transactions for tax deduction at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>