<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 866 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254523</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned orders, recognizing the lack of jurisdiction and nullity of parallel assessment proceedings initiated by respondent no. 3. The writ petition was allowed, and costs were awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 866 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254523</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned orders, recognizing the lack of jurisdiction and nullity of parallel assessment proceedings initiated by respondent no. 3. The writ petition was allowed, and costs were awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>