https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254522 Goods bearing the mark "MARUTI" were treated as bearing another person's brand name because the mark indicated a trade connection with that person within Explanation VIII to Notification No. 175/86-CE. The Court held that the absence of the Devanagari form used by the registered proprietor did not change the essential character of the mark. As a result, the small scale industry exemption was not available for such goods, and the denial of exemption was sustained. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254522 Goods bearing the mark "MARUTI" were treated as bearing another person's brand name because the mark indicated a trade connection with that person within Explanation VIII to Notification No. 175/86-CE. The Court held that the absence of the Devanagari form used by the registered proprietor did not change the essential character of the mark. As a result, the small scale industry exemption was not available for such goods, and the denial of exemption was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254522