<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 863 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254520</link>
    <description>Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was treated as mandatorily applicable once its statutory conditions were satisfied, leaving no discretion to waive or reduce penalty. Partial payment of duty before the show-cause notice, or payment of the balance after notice but before adjudication, did not displace the penal consequence. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalty was therefore set aside, and the mandatory penalty was restored in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 863 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254520</link>
      <description>Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was treated as mandatorily applicable once its statutory conditions were satisfied, leaving no discretion to waive or reduce penalty. Partial payment of duty before the show-cause notice, or payment of the balance after notice but before adjudication, did not displace the penal consequence. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalty was therefore set aside, and the mandatory penalty was restored in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>