<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 860 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a paper manufacturing unit, for importing toxic plastic waste along with waste paper. The appellant successfully argued that they had ordered waste paper and were not involved in the import of plastic materials. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant to the toxic plastic content and concluded that the penalty was unjust. Consequently, the penalty was overturned, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 860 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a paper manufacturing unit, for importing toxic plastic waste along with waste paper. The appellant successfully argued that they had ordered waste paper and were not involved in the import of plastic materials. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant to the toxic plastic content and concluded that the penalty was unjust. Consequently, the penalty was overturned, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>