<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 841 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254498</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka clarified that shares of private limited companies qualify as Long Term Capital Assets if held for 12 months for capital gains tax purposes. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the misinterpreted holding period of 36 months as Short Term Capital Gain. The court emphasized that the proviso to Section 2(42A) applies to shares in any company, not distinguishing between private, public, or listed companies. Consequently, the court granted the benefit of Long Term Capital Asset treatment and set aside the impugned orders, likely leading to the reversal of interest imposition under Sections 234A and 234B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 22:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 841 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254498</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka clarified that shares of private limited companies qualify as Long Term Capital Assets if held for 12 months for capital gains tax purposes. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the misinterpreted holding period of 36 months as Short Term Capital Gain. The court emphasized that the proviso to Section 2(42A) applies to shares in any company, not distinguishing between private, public, or listed companies. Consequently, the court granted the benefit of Long Term Capital Asset treatment and set aside the impugned orders, likely leading to the reversal of interest imposition under Sections 234A and 234B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>