<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 837 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254494</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving unexplained investment in a bank account and unexplained expenditure due to a totaling error. The Tribunal found that the deposits in the bank account were made in a different assessment year, rendering the addition invalid for the year under appeal. Additionally, discrepancies in purchases were attributed to a totaling error by the assessing officer, which was successfully demonstrated during the appeal, leading to the deletion of the addition. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the decisions of the AO and Ld. CIT(A) on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 837 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254494</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving unexplained investment in a bank account and unexplained expenditure due to a totaling error. The Tribunal found that the deposits in the bank account were made in a different assessment year, rendering the addition invalid for the year under appeal. Additionally, discrepancies in purchases were attributed to a totaling error by the assessing officer, which was successfully demonstrated during the appeal, leading to the deletion of the addition. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the decisions of the AO and Ld. CIT(A) on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>