https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167559 The court upheld the validity of Rule 59(1) of the VAT Rules and sub-sections (3) and (4) of Section 17 of the VAT Act. It confirmed the jurisdiction of the assessing authorities as authorized by the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner. The court also found no violation of principles of natural justice in the assessment orders. The writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the legality and procedural correctness of the assessments under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. en-us Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167559 The court upheld the validity of Rule 59(1) of the VAT Rules and sub-sections (3) and (4) of Section 17 of the VAT Act. It confirmed the jurisdiction of the assessing authorities as authorized by the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner. The court also found no violation of principles of natural justice in the assessment orders. The writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the legality and procedural correctness of the assessments under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167559