<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 259 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals, concluding that lampholders could be classified under Item 61 of the Central Excise Tariff based on prevalent trade understanding, supported by industry standards and definitions. The decision emphasized interpreting tariff entries in line with common trade practices and accepted meanings within the commercial context, upholding the classification of lampholders as sockets under the relevant tariff item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 259 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals, concluding that lampholders could be classified under Item 61 of the Central Excise Tariff based on prevalent trade understanding, supported by industry standards and definitions. The decision emphasized interpreting tariff entries in line with common trade practices and accepted meanings within the commercial context, upholding the classification of lampholders as sockets under the relevant tariff item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>