<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 294 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167540</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Gold (Control) Act could not be sustained where service of the foundational show cause notice was not proved. The record did not show proper dispatch and delivery or return of the notice, and mere simultaneous display on office notice boards was not treated as valid service under the Act. Because the appellant was not given an effective opportunity of hearing, the notice requirement and principles of natural justice were held to be breached. The penalty order was therefore set aside, with liberty to proceed again after due notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:21:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 294 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167540</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Gold (Control) Act could not be sustained where service of the foundational show cause notice was not proved. The record did not show proper dispatch and delivery or return of the notice, and mere simultaneous display on office notice boards was not treated as valid service under the Act. Because the appellant was not given an effective opportunity of hearing, the notice requirement and principles of natural justice were held to be breached. The penalty order was therefore set aside, with liberty to proceed again after due notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>