https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167532 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders due to the Department's failure to comply with the statutory limitation period under Section 11A of the Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of correct interpretation of duty notifications, adherence to legal timelines for issuing notices, and the limitations on demanding payments beyond the prescribed period. en-us Fri, 17 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:00:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167532 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders due to the Department's failure to comply with the statutory limitation period under Section 11A of the Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of correct interpretation of duty notifications, adherence to legal timelines for issuing notices, and the limitations on demanding payments beyond the prescribed period. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167532