<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 292 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, rejecting the objection on locus standi of Food Corporation of India (FCI) and directing the adjustment of pre-inspection charges at a lower rate. Additionally, the Tribunal limited the demand to the quantity of goods actually landed, excluding short-landed fertilizers from the calculation. The decision was supported by the authority granted to FCI by the Government of India and the specific contractual terms presented as evidence by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 292 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, rejecting the objection on locus standi of Food Corporation of India (FCI) and directing the adjustment of pre-inspection charges at a lower rate. Additionally, the Tribunal limited the demand to the quantity of goods actually landed, excluding short-landed fertilizers from the calculation. The decision was supported by the authority granted to FCI by the Government of India and the specific contractual terms presented as evidence by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>