<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 291 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs&#039; order regarding the seizure of hashish from a consignment dispatched to the United States, citing lack of evidence connecting the exporters to the contraband. Emphasizing the delay in proceedings and absence of concrete proof, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s. Bee Emm (India) Exports and the proprietor, concluding that Customs failed to establish a clear link to the seized hashish.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 291 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs&#039; order regarding the seizure of hashish from a consignment dispatched to the United States, citing lack of evidence connecting the exporters to the contraband. Emphasizing the delay in proceedings and absence of concrete proof, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s. Bee Emm (India) Exports and the proprietor, concluding that Customs failed to establish a clear link to the seized hashish.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>