<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 236 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants in a case concerning refund claims under the excess production scheme. The Assistant Collector&#039;s rejection of the claims due to delay was overturned, with the Tribunal emphasizing the relevance of the date of filing the declaration for the refund claim. However, one specific point was not addressed in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 11:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 236 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants in a case concerning refund claims under the excess production scheme. The Assistant Collector&#039;s rejection of the claims due to delay was overturned, with the Tribunal emphasizing the relevance of the date of filing the declaration for the refund claim. However, one specific point was not addressed in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>