<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 291 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order setting aside the confiscation of gold ornaments under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, emphasizing the respondent&#039;s right to cross-examine mahazar witnesses for fair adjudication. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and natural justice principles, dismissing the appeal by the Collector of Central Excise and emphasizing the need to afford parties the opportunity to challenge crucial documents relied upon in proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 291 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order setting aside the confiscation of gold ornaments under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, emphasizing the respondent&#039;s right to cross-examine mahazar witnesses for fair adjudication. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and natural justice principles, dismissing the appeal by the Collector of Central Excise and emphasizing the need to afford parties the opportunity to challenge crucial documents relied upon in proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>