<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 359 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167515</link>
    <description>Fermentation gas containing over 99% carbon dioxide was not classifiable as compressed carbon dioxide under item 14-H of the First Schedule because the expression &quot;compressed gas&quot; was used in the commercial and technical sense of gas compressed into cylinders or similar containers at prescribed pressure for storage, handling and transport. Gas merely conveyed through pipe-lines under pressure did not meet that description. The fact that the gas was substantially carbon dioxide, or possibly sub-standard, did not alter its character; what mattered was the absence of compression in the relevant sense. On that basis, the gas fell outside item 14-H and was not liable to duty under that entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 359 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167515</link>
      <description>Fermentation gas containing over 99% carbon dioxide was not classifiable as compressed carbon dioxide under item 14-H of the First Schedule because the expression &quot;compressed gas&quot; was used in the commercial and technical sense of gas compressed into cylinders or similar containers at prescribed pressure for storage, handling and transport. Gas merely conveyed through pipe-lines under pressure did not meet that description. The fact that the gas was substantially carbon dioxide, or possibly sub-standard, did not alter its character; what mattered was the absence of compression in the relevant sense. On that basis, the gas fell outside item 14-H and was not liable to duty under that entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>