<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 358 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167511</link>
    <description>The Collector Appeals allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of refund claims as time-barred. The appellants, manufacturing companies, successfully argued that exemption eligibility under notification 71/78 should be determined at the end of the financial year, with the six-month claim period starting thereafter. Citing a government decision and legal precedent, the Collector Appeals held that the period of limitation for refund claims should commence from the financial year&#039;s end when total clearances are known. Consequently, the Assistant Collector&#039;s rejection was set aside, and full refunds were directed to the appellants based on Section 11B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 358 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167511</link>
      <description>The Collector Appeals allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of refund claims as time-barred. The appellants, manufacturing companies, successfully argued that exemption eligibility under notification 71/78 should be determined at the end of the financial year, with the six-month claim period starting thereafter. Citing a government decision and legal precedent, the Collector Appeals held that the period of limitation for refund claims should commence from the financial year&#039;s end when total clearances are known. Consequently, the Assistant Collector&#039;s rejection was set aside, and full refunds were directed to the appellants based on Section 11B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>