<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 190 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Unik Springs (India), allowing their appeal for duty concession under Notification No. 119/75 for job work on spring steel flats. The Tribunal held that the job work processes undertaken did not result in a complete transformation of the original material, making them eligible for the duty exemption. The order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 190 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Unik Springs (India), allowing their appeal for duty concession under Notification No. 119/75 for job work on spring steel flats. The Tribunal held that the job work processes undertaken did not result in a complete transformation of the original material, making them eligible for the duty exemption. The order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>