<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 289 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified citric acid as a pharmaceutical under the exemption notification, rejecting arguments based on predominant use and end use. Citric acid was deemed eligible for exemption when used in pharmaceutical manufacturing, subject to meeting pharmacopoeial standards and being used as a drug or drug-intermediate. The exemption was not unconditional and required verification of end use by the central excise department to ensure compliance with deserving clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:49:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 289 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified citric acid as a pharmaceutical under the exemption notification, rejecting arguments based on predominant use and end use. Citric acid was deemed eligible for exemption when used in pharmaceutical manufacturing, subject to meeting pharmacopoeial standards and being used as a drug or drug-intermediate. The exemption was not unconditional and required verification of end use by the central excise department to ensure compliance with deserving clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>