<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 364 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Collector&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals. It ruled that &quot;clearances&quot; encompass all goods removed, aligning with the notification&#039;s aim of boosting production. The case was categorized under Clause 2(2)(c), with the highest clearances in 1975-76 as the base clearances. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting &quot;clearances&quot; broadly to fulfill the notification&#039;s purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:42:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 364 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Collector&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals. It ruled that &quot;clearances&quot; encompass all goods removed, aligning with the notification&#039;s aim of boosting production. The case was categorized under Clause 2(2)(c), with the highest clearances in 1975-76 as the base clearances. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting &quot;clearances&quot; broadly to fulfill the notification&#039;s purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>