<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 340 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167496</link>
    <description>The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta allowed the appeal of an appellant firm regarding duty on samples, finding the demand for duty time-barred and unjustified. The firm&#039;s argument that samples were drawn before the duty accounting point was accepted, leading to the setting aside of the Assistant Collector&#039;s order and a direction for a refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 340 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167496</link>
      <description>The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta allowed the appeal of an appellant firm regarding duty on samples, finding the demand for duty time-barred and unjustified. The firm&#039;s argument that samples were drawn before the duty accounting point was accepted, leading to the setting aside of the Assistant Collector&#039;s order and a direction for a refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>