<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 308 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167493</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 42/74 applied to steel ingots manufactured from fresh unused duty-paid steel melting scrap, even though the scrap had been assessed under a higher excise classification. The notification was read by reference to the duty leviable on the scrap, not to classification under Item 26 alone, and the determining factor was proof that duty had in fact been paid. Departmental clarification supported this interpretation for scrap arising from products assessed under Item 26AA. Relief was therefore admissible to the extent of the correct duty relatable to the scrap used, with the refund quantum left for verification by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 308 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167493</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 42/74 applied to steel ingots manufactured from fresh unused duty-paid steel melting scrap, even though the scrap had been assessed under a higher excise classification. The notification was read by reference to the duty leviable on the scrap, not to classification under Item 26 alone, and the determining factor was proof that duty had in fact been paid. Departmental clarification supported this interpretation for scrap arising from products assessed under Item 26AA. Relief was therefore admissible to the extent of the correct duty relatable to the scrap used, with the refund quantum left for verification by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>