<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 316 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the products manufactured by APC were classified as slabs or blocks, not sheets. As a result, they were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E. The reliance on specific expert opinions by the Collector was deemed invalid, and penalties and confiscation were set aside. The appeal favored APC, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor on all disputed issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 316 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the products manufactured by APC were classified as slabs or blocks, not sheets. As a result, they were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E. The reliance on specific expert opinions by the Collector was deemed invalid, and penalties and confiscation were set aside. The appeal favored APC, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor on all disputed issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>