<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 304 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the goods were classifiable under Tariff Item No. 29A(3) and not T.I. 68, overturning the Collector&#039;s decision. The appeal was allowed, dismissing the cross-objection filed by the respondents seeking a full refund for the entire period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:26:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 304 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the goods were classifiable under Tariff Item No. 29A(3) and not T.I. 68, overturning the Collector&#039;s decision. The appeal was allowed, dismissing the cross-objection filed by the respondents seeking a full refund for the entire period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>