<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 829 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit 10% of the duty confirmed within eight weeks, with the balance dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. Failure to comply would result in the appeal&#039;s dismissal without further notice. The decision emphasized the need for a detailed analysis to determine if the received amount constituted liquidated damages or compensation, considering the remand by the High Court as a basis for the directive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 07:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 829 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit 10% of the duty confirmed within eight weeks, with the balance dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. Failure to comply would result in the appeal&#039;s dismissal without further notice. The decision emphasized the need for a detailed analysis to determine if the received amount constituted liquidated damages or compensation, considering the remand by the High Court as a basis for the directive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>