<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 828 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not applicable in the case where the appellants had paid service tax erroneously. The appellants, as ultimate owners of residential flats, were not liable to pay service tax as per Circular No. 108/2/2009-S.T. dated 29-1-2009. Therefore, the impugned orders rejecting the refund claims were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 07:19:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 828 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not applicable in the case where the appellants had paid service tax erroneously. The appellants, as ultimate owners of residential flats, were not liable to pay service tax as per Circular No. 108/2/2009-S.T. dated 29-1-2009. Therefore, the impugned orders rejecting the refund claims were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>