<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 827 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254484</link>
    <description>The appeal focused on the eligibility of Cenvat credit based on debit notes for sales commission. The first appellate authority confirmed compliance with relevant rules but ordered verification of Service Tax payment by the service provider, not part of the show cause notice. The Tribunal deemed this verification beyond the notice&#039;s scope and allowed the appeal as the Revenue did not challenge it. The case highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to notice requirements in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 07:19:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 827 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254484</link>
      <description>The appeal focused on the eligibility of Cenvat credit based on debit notes for sales commission. The first appellate authority confirmed compliance with relevant rules but ordered verification of Service Tax payment by the service provider, not part of the show cause notice. The Tribunal deemed this verification beyond the notice&#039;s scope and allowed the appeal as the Revenue did not challenge it. The case highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to notice requirements in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>