<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254479</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the demand for duty, penalties on the directors, and the decision that the biscuits supplied to MCD were not eligible for assessment under Section 4A. The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with SWM (PC) Rules and transparency in pricing to prevent duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254479</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the demand for duty, penalties on the directors, and the decision that the biscuits supplied to MCD were not eligible for assessment under Section 4A. The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with SWM (PC) Rules and transparency in pricing to prevent duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>