<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254479</link>
    <description>Biscuits supplied to a Municipal Corporation under a contract for free distribution were treated as supplies to an institutional buyer, not retail sales. The printed figure on the packs was held not to be a genuine MRP because it reflected the contract arrangement, including free wheat supplied by the Corporation, and was not a retail price under the Packaged Commodities Rules. The goods were therefore assessable under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, not Section 4A. The same conduct, including non-disclosure of the material arrangement and use of an artificial price, supported a finding of suppression and intent to evade duty, so the duty demand, interest and penalties were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254479</link>
      <description>Biscuits supplied to a Municipal Corporation under a contract for free distribution were treated as supplies to an institutional buyer, not retail sales. The printed figure on the packs was held not to be a genuine MRP because it reflected the contract arrangement, including free wheat supplied by the Corporation, and was not a retail price under the Packaged Commodities Rules. The goods were therefore assessable under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, not Section 4A. The same conduct, including non-disclosure of the material arrangement and use of an artificial price, supported a finding of suppression and intent to evade duty, so the duty demand, interest and penalties were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>