https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254472 The impugned order was treated as a suspension order, not a termination or dismissal order, so the challenge framed as one against dismissal did not survive in that form. The petitioner was nevertheless held entitled to subsistence allowance during the pending disciplinary proceedings. The authority was permitted to initiate departmental action and was directed to complete the proceedings within the stipulated period if commenced. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with liberty to proceed departmentally. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:53:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254472 The impugned order was treated as a suspension order, not a termination or dismissal order, so the challenge framed as one against dismissal did not survive in that form. The petitioner was nevertheless held entitled to subsistence allowance during the pending disciplinary proceedings. The authority was permitted to initiate departmental action and was directed to complete the proceedings within the stipulated period if commenced. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with liberty to proceed departmentally. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254472