<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 813 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to inadequacies in the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for specific findings on crucial issues such as the classification of imported goods, validity of documents, confiscation of goods, and value enhancement. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present additional evidence, stressing the importance of procedural fairness in customs-related disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 813 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to inadequacies in the Commissioner&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for specific findings on crucial issues such as the classification of imported goods, validity of documents, confiscation of goods, and value enhancement. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present additional evidence, stressing the importance of procedural fairness in customs-related disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>