https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254449 The Tribunal found the appellants' argument on service tax liability before 1.6.2007 untenable but acknowledged confusion regarding work orders. The classification of constructed flats and bungalows required further examination. Despite some unresolved points, the Tribunal did not order additional pre-deposit as the appellants had paid a significant portion of the demand. Recovery of the remaining tax, interest, and penalties was stayed. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254449 The Tribunal found the appellants' argument on service tax liability before 1.6.2007 untenable but acknowledged confusion regarding work orders. The classification of constructed flats and bungalows required further examination. Despite some unresolved points, the Tribunal did not order additional pre-deposit as the appellants had paid a significant portion of the demand. Recovery of the remaining tax, interest, and penalties was stayed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254449