https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254448 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible for cenvat credit on service tax paid by insurance providers for policies related to the appellant's business activities. The denial of credit based on a second address in the insurance policy was deemed incorrect as the address was part of the same entity. The Tribunal directed the appellant to reverse a refund claimed from insurance companies and pay interest, but allowed cenvat credit of Rs. 2,31,918/- without imposing any penalty. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:25:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254448 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible for cenvat credit on service tax paid by insurance providers for policies related to the appellant's business activities. The denial of credit based on a second address in the insurance policy was deemed incorrect as the address was part of the same entity. The Tribunal directed the appellant to reverse a refund claimed from insurance companies and pay interest, but allowed cenvat credit of Rs. 2,31,918/- without imposing any penalty. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254448