<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 789 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254446</link>
    <description>An amended service tax small scale exemption notification governed entitlement where the revised turnover limit was substituted from eight lakh rupees to ten lakh rupees, and the assessee&#039;s preceding-year turnover did not exceed that enhanced threshold. The demand therefore survived only to the extent of the tax admittedly payable by the assessee, with interest. Penalty was not warranted because the dispute arose from a bona fide interpretative issue concerning the exemption notification and the assessee had already discharged tax on the balance amount. The balance demand and penalty were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 789 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254446</link>
      <description>An amended service tax small scale exemption notification governed entitlement where the revised turnover limit was substituted from eight lakh rupees to ten lakh rupees, and the assessee&#039;s preceding-year turnover did not exceed that enhanced threshold. The demand therefore survived only to the extent of the tax admittedly payable by the assessee, with interest. Penalty was not warranted because the dispute arose from a bona fide interpretative issue concerning the exemption notification and the assessee had already discharged tax on the balance amount. The balance demand and penalty were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>