<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 788 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254445</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue against the non-imposition of penalties under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The Tribunal found errors in not imposing penalties under Section 76 as the show cause notice was issued before the amendment to Section 78, allowing penalties under either section. Consequently, the orders of the Lower Authorities were set aside, and penalties under Section 76 were imposed in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 788 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254445</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue against the non-imposition of penalties under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The Tribunal found errors in not imposing penalties under Section 76 as the show cause notice was issued before the amendment to Section 78, allowing penalties under either section. Consequently, the orders of the Lower Authorities were set aside, and penalties under Section 76 were imposed in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>