<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 785 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the exporter&#039;s appeal against the rejection of refund claims for Service Tax paid under Renting of Immovable Property service in relation to port services. The Tribunal held that services received in the port area should be considered port services, even if taxed under Renting of Immovable Property service. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the appellant the refund claims, setting aside the previous orders and providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 785 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the exporter&#039;s appeal against the rejection of refund claims for Service Tax paid under Renting of Immovable Property service in relation to port services. The Tribunal held that services received in the port area should be considered port services, even if taxed under Renting of Immovable Property service. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the appellant the refund claims, setting aside the previous orders and providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>