<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 775 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254432</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the dismissal of restoration petitions and directing the Tribunal to dispose of the appeals on merits. The Court emphasized that the conditional order had been complied with by the appellants, albeit belatedly, by pre-depositing the entire amount as ordered by the Tribunal. As a result, the appeals were allowed on specified terms, with no costs imposed, and related petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 775 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254432</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the dismissal of restoration petitions and directing the Tribunal to dispose of the appeals on merits. The Court emphasized that the conditional order had been complied with by the appellants, albeit belatedly, by pre-depositing the entire amount as ordered by the Tribunal. As a result, the appeals were allowed on specified terms, with no costs imposed, and related petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>