https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254430 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to lack of jurisdiction. The original order was from Mumbai, and filing the appeal in Delhi was deemed improper. Despite opportunities to rectify the jurisdictional issue, the Revenue failed to do so. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the High Court emphasized the need for appeals to be filed in the appropriate High Court with jurisdiction. The applications were disposed of, allowing the Revenue to pursue the appeal in the correct forum, stressing the significance of jurisdictional considerations in legal matters. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254430 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to lack of jurisdiction. The original order was from Mumbai, and filing the appeal in Delhi was deemed improper. Despite opportunities to rectify the jurisdictional issue, the Revenue failed to do so. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the High Court emphasized the need for appeals to be filed in the appropriate High Court with jurisdiction. The applications were disposed of, allowing the Revenue to pursue the appeal in the correct forum, stressing the significance of jurisdictional considerations in legal matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254430