<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 757 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing a higher rate of depreciation on ITG Networking Equipments, permitting depreciation on company-owned vehicles used for business purposes, disallowing disallowance of running and maintenance expenses of vehicles for non-business use, remanding the disallowance of prior period expenses for verification, and excluding certain comparables in transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal precedents and principles of comparability in transfer pricing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 757 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing a higher rate of depreciation on ITG Networking Equipments, permitting depreciation on company-owned vehicles used for business purposes, disallowing disallowance of running and maintenance expenses of vehicles for non-business use, remanding the disallowance of prior period expenses for verification, and excluding certain comparables in transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal precedents and principles of comparability in transfer pricing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>