<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 754 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee. The protective assessment was deleted as the Revenue failed to provide the status of the substantive addition. The addition based on the DVO&#039;s report was also deleted since the AO had not rejected the books of account, following established legal principles and precedents from higher courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 754 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee. The protective assessment was deleted as the Revenue failed to provide the status of the substantive addition. The addition based on the DVO&#039;s report was also deleted since the AO had not rejected the books of account, following established legal principles and precedents from higher courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>