<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 753 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, ruling that the expenses claimed by the assessee were revenue in nature, as they were for maintaining existing assets and did not involve acquiring new capital assets. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the expenses were not capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 753 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, ruling that the expenses claimed by the assessee were revenue in nature, as they were for maintaining existing assets and did not involve acquiring new capital assets. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the expenses were not capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>