<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 301 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the flat knitting machine Model DX 2000 should be classified as domestic under Heading 84.37(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, with its parts falling under Heading 84.38(2). The order of the Collector of Customs (Appeals) was set aside, and the order of the Assistant Collector of Customs (Refund), Bombay, was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 301 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the flat knitting machine Model DX 2000 should be classified as domestic under Heading 84.37(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, with its parts falling under Heading 84.38(2). The order of the Collector of Customs (Appeals) was set aside, and the order of the Assistant Collector of Customs (Refund), Bombay, was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>