https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167455 Marylon Medicated Shampoo was held to fall under the tariff entry for shampoo within toilet preparations because its common parlance identity and actual use were as a shampoo. The product was marketed and instructed for shampoo use, and its cleansing and lathering properties confirmed that character. Although it contained medicinal or antiseptic ingredients and was manufactured under a drug licence, those features did not override the specific tariff classification. The contention that it was a patent or proprietary medicine was rejected, and the shampoo classification was upheld. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:01:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167455 Marylon Medicated Shampoo was held to fall under the tariff entry for shampoo within toilet preparations because its common parlance identity and actual use were as a shampoo. The product was marketed and instructed for shampoo use, and its cleansing and lathering properties confirmed that character. Although it contained medicinal or antiseptic ingredients and was manufactured under a drug licence, those features did not override the specific tariff classification. The contention that it was a patent or proprietary medicine was rejected, and the shampoo classification was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167455