<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 228 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167452</link>
    <description>Illustrative words such as &quot;such as&quot; in a tariff entry do not restrict the main description, so a continuous ice-cream freezer as a ready-assembled refrigerating appliance remained within Tariff Item 29-A(1) and attracted additional duty. Separate accessories like a can filler, fruit feeder and ripple machine, shown as having independent functions, could not be treated as composite machinery under Heading 84.15(1) because the freezer could operate without them and they did not satisfy the relevant section and chapter notes for complementary or principal functions. The customs classification adopted by the department was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 12:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 228 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167452</link>
      <description>Illustrative words such as &quot;such as&quot; in a tariff entry do not restrict the main description, so a continuous ice-cream freezer as a ready-assembled refrigerating appliance remained within Tariff Item 29-A(1) and attracted additional duty. Separate accessories like a can filler, fruit feeder and ripple machine, shown as having independent functions, could not be treated as composite machinery under Heading 84.15(1) because the freezer could operate without them and they did not satisfy the relevant section and chapter notes for complementary or principal functions. The customs classification adopted by the department was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>