<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 283 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167446</link>
    <description>Licensed gold dealers must account for all gold and ornaments found in business premises, particularly where articles are kept for sale and are not recorded. Statutory forms were not decisive in that setting. Voluntary inculpatory statements, recovery of concealed records indicating off-book dealings, and the statutory presumption against the person in possession supported confiscation and penalty. A belated retraction, unsupported claims that goods belonged to relatives, additional evidence, and reliance on treatment by income-tax or sales-tax authorities did not rebut the presumption. Contravention and consequential liability remained, although the redemption fine and penalty were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 283 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167446</link>
      <description>Licensed gold dealers must account for all gold and ornaments found in business premises, particularly where articles are kept for sale and are not recorded. Statutory forms were not decisive in that setting. Voluntary inculpatory statements, recovery of concealed records indicating off-book dealings, and the statutory presumption against the person in possession supported confiscation and penalty. A belated retraction, unsupported claims that goods belonged to relatives, additional evidence, and reliance on treatment by income-tax or sales-tax authorities did not rebut the presumption. Contravention and consequential liability remained, although the redemption fine and penalty were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>